Compare and Contrast the Depiction of War and Soldiers in Birdsong and Strange Meeting Essay

In the maiden half of the twentieth snow bloodshed was overabundant as contend on a global eggshell fadered on two occasions. These were not merely effective on people that witnessed the calamity but also for propaganda and literature that would occur years later. Two of the most dominant authors depic offerg soldiers and fight were Englishmen Sebastian Faulks and Susan Hill.They expressed their suasions on such matters with literature such as Birdsong and eery Meeting respectively. In comparison some(prenominal) school texts were wrote wi thin the become forty years categorising them two(prenominal) as modernistic texts. Along with the information that twain authors were neither there or somewhat at the time, this would indicate that their novels be both adaptations of stories they energise heard and open to tasty licence resulting in both creation hump works of fiction. passim both deplumes of the texts many comparisons and contrasts can be brought up involv ing the delegacy war is opinionated for the soldiers. The first contrast that can be make is the index that the 3rd person illustrates active the impingees but by two un exchangeable styles of writing. Birdsong creates the feeling of negativity relating to the trenches through and through a strong expenditure of bodry involving death.Language such as cry, primitive fear and rigid automobile trunk along with the use as compendious and punctual sentences creates a representation of a unvariedly changing and dangerous environment perhaps portraying the speed of the soldiers heartbeats involved, enabling the proof subscriber to understand the rush and brat the soldiers are feeling and representing the horror of the trenches from the soldiers straits of view. This is in stark contrast to remote Meeting which describes the trenches with descriptive language and in a positive light, a to the full moon shone above the ridge.The frost was thin and here and there it caught in the unhinged light on the barbed wire, tin canisters, helmets, and gleamed. This dissimilar interpretation of the trenches offers a complete alternative opinion of trench feeling as throughout the deplume haggle such as frost, jokes and static portray a very equable and peaceful place, somewhere not to be afraid of. This is a complete inequality to the interpretation of Birdsong. A cool it and positive situation is also highlighted in the attitude of the soldiers and the descent they have with distributively opposite(a)(a) throughout the extinguish of eery Meeting.Within the extract, the author highlights the relationships that Barton, an incumbent, has with Parkin, a soldier, as un menagely but calm. A eonian awkwardness is represented with the way that the two characters converse with apiece other. Sir? / Hello, Parkin. every right? have you, sir? / no have you? / No. could be used to represent the incessant problem that an officer has with relatin g to Parkin, a unbroken problem with class and a constant inability to communicate for any space of time.The use of short and sharp responses from both sides represents that both social classes dont rattling know what to say to each other and find it difficult to be themselves in each others company. The class endeavor is further highlighted with the presentation of the character Hilliard. Hilliard, much standardized Barton, is an officer in the trenches. The relationship with which he has with Barton compared to Parkin is of bully difference representing the social boundaries that members of the British force throughout human macrocosms War I would have faced.The relationship that Barton has with his social equal, Hilliard, could be viewed as a strong family draw together and perhaps even slightly homosexual. The comfortable relationship that both officers have compared to the relationship with Parkin re completelyy highlights the point that class boundaries are a major factor. The structure of both conversations next to each other re whollyy highlights the clashes as direct contrasts and comparisons can be drawn amidst both conversations.The use of this by the author really illustrates to the reader the differences in the characters and enables the reader to draw up questions about the officers. The relationship that Barton and Hilliard have could be portrayed as being like husband and wife. This is highlighted where it states Do you need to routine the lamp on? I thought you were asleep. / No, I was waiting for you. . This could be interpreted by the reader as being exceedingly homosexual and similar to a wed life at home.A constant representation of the Queer Theory is brought up through many texts involving the First World War and seemed to be acceptable inside the trenches. This is further highlighted with Strange Meeting where it states in conversation between Barton and Hilliard I motive to take you everywhere, show you everything T his further highlights their struggle with homosexuality but it also gives the reader an insight into what Susan Hills opinion regarding the war is about.The talk of everything and anything at heart the war could perhaps insinuate boredom through the trenches or perhaps even to a greater extent controversially the fear with which the soldiers have. Their constant misdirection and conversation about other matters foreign the war could indicate that even the image of trench life which has been talked as being calm and okay within the extract could in fact be wonderful the soldiers involved so much that they want to be constantly distracted remote from it and discuss the positivity that thinking of home and the outside world may have.The indication that the positivity could be hiding the negativity of the war. The relationship between soldiers offers a contrastive interpretation in Birdsong. Throughout Birdsong there is very olive-sized conversation between the soldiers unlike S trange Meeting so the reader has to gathering a sense of the relationships from what the voice of the extract is telling them rather than from converse between the characters. The constant theme regarding the soldiers throughout the extract is trade union, in contrast to homosexual tendencies in Strange Meeting.Constant references throughout he extract such as The three men lay culmination together, Help me, and brother all create an image of friendship and brotherhood to the reader and helps insinuate that they are all there to help each other and watch each others back in the horrors of war. Even though this also shows togetherness between the soldiers much like Strange meeting the readers interpretations differ as one text depicts the soldiers as too close and the other as good friends.The constantly different interpretations with both extracts is completely down to the fact that both authors only have facts of what they have heard and have no first-hand regard of the trenche s due to the texts modernistic tendencies. Along with differing fortune throughout all the lines of the trenches no direct accounts can be given within the two texts regarding the way the trenches and the soldiers relationships with each other would have been as no trench would have been the same, the soldiers would have been all of differing backgrounds and differing opinions on the job they have to do.